Former Nairobi governor Mike Sonko has moved to the East African Court of Justice to challenge Kenya's Supreme Court's decision to uphold his impeachment.
He wants the regional court to certify the matter urgently and temporarily stop the implementation of the judgment rendered by the top court on Friday.
"Sonko is gravely and fundamentally aggrieved by the decision of the Supreme Court of Kenya and in the manner in which the said Court and the Courts below (High Court and Court of Appeal) conducted the said proceedings contrary to the rule of law and the rules of natural justice with the resultant effect of grave injustice and miscarriage of justice being visited upon him," the court papers read.
He claims that actions by the Kenyan Judiciary were in breach of Articles 6 (d), and 7 (2); of the Treaty of the Establishment of the East African Community "in that he has been discriminated against and has been selectively persecuted".
"His fundamental political rights and freedoms were illegally, unlawfully, and unjustifiably curtailed over a flawed judicial process tainted and marred by illegalities, lack of transparency, lack of accountability and failure to adhere to the rule of law," his lawyers say.
"The decision by the Supreme Court of Kenya and the courts of Kenya, was arrived at in an unjust manner; contrary to the above-cited principles and the effect of the said decision is to curtail the political rights of Sonko and the people he represents," he argues.
